Connect with us

Opinion

THE IMPERATIVE OF FEDERAL MINISTRY OF DIASPORA AFFAIRS IN TINUBU ADMINISTRATION

Published

on

By FEMI ODERE

It’s indeed a sad observation that what passes as development as we know it happened despite Nigeria’s brimming human capital endowment that has always been coveted by developed countries around the world. It’s also a sad commentary that the country’s political leaders have failed woefully to galvanize the talents and resourcefulness of the Nigerian people for sustainable development.

Of all the inability, if not failure of our political leaders to circle the country’s development wagon around the people, perhaps one of the most disappointingly depressing of these failures has been the exclusion of Nigerians in the diaspora (in real and practical terms) in the nation’s developmental matrix despite several data that has proven that this highly credentialed and resource-endowed critical mass is the bedrock of development in any given society.

Thus, our leaders’ inability to properly situate the diaspora piece on the country’s development puzzle will continue to stunt the nation’s growth, especially in an increasingly globalized world where competition for human and material resources has never been more intense which the fungibility of knowledge happens to be the driving force of this intensity.

To be sure, there has never been a time in the history of the country’s electioneering campaigns that a presidential candidate gave prominence to Nigerians in the diaspora and the opportunity to be actively involved in the electoral process than the creation of a Diaspora Directorate by the Presidential Campaign Council of now president-elect Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

There also has never been a time that a critical mass of Nigerians in the Diaspora was so enthusiastic in supporting a candidate’s presidential aspiration as they did with then-candidate Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu to the extent that they donated themselves, time, energies, and materials to the campaign.

The political capital that has accrued to the president-elect Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu from Nigerians in the diaspora and their readiness to holistically participate in the nation’s development as never before should, as a matter of urgency, if not priority, be translated and converted to a veritable mechanism for national rebirth and economic growth.

While there’s every indication that the president-elect will actively court the expertise and harness the resources of the Nigerian diaspora community with deliberate intensity, a good starting point in this quest is the creation of a full-fledged Federal Ministry of Diaspora Affairs.

In lieu of when diaspora voting would become manifest in the nation’s body politic—-which is the political component of their overarching desire to participate in the country’s development—-the shortest route by the incoming Tinubu government to addressing the multifarious socio-economic challenges it will inherit in a few months—-some of which are quite unprecedented but not insurmountable—-the establishment of a diaspora ministry is the next best thing. The ministry, as part of its core mandates, would interface the diaspora community with the three arms of government on the one hand, government MDAs for capacity building and enhancement, and resource allocation for overall national development on the other.

The argument for a full-fledged federal ministry for the country’s diaspora community can be predicated on three key empirical factors; and these are population, literacy, and financial endowment by way of remittances.

Although a very close approximation of the Nigerian population in the diaspora may be difficult to ascertain due to a lack of up-to-date data and illegal migration, according to the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Nigeria had a Diaspora population of 1.7 million people as far back as 2017. While this figure can be used as a base measurement to advance an argument, it’s chronically on the low ebb of the population scale because of the spike in the emigration of Nigerians from their country of birth since the year in which the data was issued.

What’s more, it can also be said without any fear of contradiction that Nigerians who migrated illegally to different countries of the world probably surpass those whose migration was done within the confines of the laws of their host countries.

Aside from this outdated UN population data on diasporic Nigerians, data from other sources estimate that the diaspora population is between 15 and 17 million people. This is a staggering population.

Even if one is compelled to use the 1.7 million UN data baseline, the fact remains that the Nigerian diaspora population is still far more than the population of about 30 countries of the world including Brunei, Suriname, Luxembourg, and Montenegro just to mention a few.

However, the 15 million population data from other sources also means that the Nigerian diaspora population outshines more than the population of 100 countries of the world including—-in no particular order—-the Republic of Guinea, Rwanda, Tunisia, Belgium, Jordan, the Dominican Republic, Sweden, Greece, Portugal, Hungary, the State of Israel, Switzerland, Austria, Hong Kong, Denmark, Finland, and Lebanon and a host of other countries.

From the foregoing, therefore, the Nigerian population in North America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East, not to say the African continent, conveniently passes for a nation that would automatically be accorded its rightful place in the comity of nations and global institutions.

Nigerians in the diaspora are hardly liabilities to their host or adopted countries even with their illegal status as they are mostly hardworking. They are a successful population that contributes in no small measure to the GDP of their host countries because they have the highest literacy rate among immigrants from other developing and underdeveloped countries.

According to the Financial Times, in the United States where there is a higher concentration of Nigerians in the diaspora among the developed countries, Nigerians are the most highly educated of all groups, with 61 percent holding at least a bachelors degree compared with 31 percent of the total foreign-born population and 32 percent of the US-born population.

The publication went further in its analysis that, “more than half of Nigerian immigrants (54 percent) were most likely to occupy management positions, compared with 32 percent of the total foreign-born population and 39 percent of the US-born population. Similar Nigerian literacy successes are reflected in the UK, “where many highly-educated diaspora works in financial services, IT, and the legal and medical professions among other high-end professions.

A reasonable deduction can then be made that if the population of Nigerians in the diaspora is so significant that it can constitute a country with its high literacy rate, it goes without saying that they would be imbued with higher incomes which would translate into increased financial receipts for their country. And this is where their remittances come in.

According to World Bank data, as of 2018, the Nigerian Diaspora remittance was $24.31bn; it dropped to $23.81bn in 2019 and in 2020 it fell to $17.21bn. This means that the Nigerian Diaspora population remitted $65.34bn in three years to boost economic activities in their country of birth.

At the US-Africa Leaders Summit on December 13-15, 2022 in Washington, D.C President Muhammadu Buhari said while addressing a town hall meeting of his country’s citizens that, “Nigerians in the diaspora remitted more than 20 billion dollars in 2021.” The president added that in this same year, “our diaspora home remittances through official channels stood at 20 billion dollars which is four times more than the value of our Foreign Direct Investment.”

Please pay attention to the “through the official channel” phrase by the Nigerian President. This phrase implies that the amount remitted to Nigeria in 2021 was certainly far more than 20 billion dollars. But because there’s no mechanism with which to record the remittances from the unofficial channels hence the $20 billion figure. And these unofficial channels are multifaceted.

Aside from the fact that diaspora remittances have in most cases been recorded as significantly more than the country’s oil receipts, it should also be recalled that the remittances of Nigerians in the diaspora were the most significant foreign receipts that kept the Nigerian economy afloat during the COVID-19 pandemic that lasted for more than a year.

From all development indicators, Nigeria is still classified as an underdeveloped country. There is therefore no excuse for an underdeveloped economy such as Nigeria not to have had a Ministry that’s solely dedicated to its diaspora given the aforesaid when ‘first world’ economies such as the State of Israel and South Korea have cabinet-level diaspora ministries.

Other countries with stand-alone ministries for their diaspora citizens, although with different nomenclatures include Armenia, Azerbaijan, Egypt, Georgia, Ghana, Indonesia, India, Jamaica, Morocco, and Senegal to name just a few.

One hopes that the creation of the United States Diaspora Advisory Council by the Biden administration—-the first of its kind in US history—-is not another strategic, long-term national interest to put the African continent in a sleep mode now that there’s an increasing number of the African diaspora in the cabinet position as well as the policy environment of the US government. Barring this conjecture, this is an opportune time for Nigeria to actively engage its diaspora citizens to positively influence the policies of developed economies toward Africa.

It should be stressed that the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NiDCOM) which is currently spearheaded by Hon. Abike Dabiri-Erewa would most likely have been moribund by now if not for her personal exertion and exemplary leadership quality because the commission was erroneously subsumed—-perhaps deliberately so to make it ineffectual—-in the domain of a pathetically uninspiring and lethargic foreign affairs minister who could not craft any futuristic and development-driven foreign policy objectives in his eight years in office. If Nigeria must play in the big league of the global diaspora network that’s currently unfolding before our own eyes in the race for resource mobilization from all angles, then the country needs not only a Diaspora ministry but an indefatigable personality of cabinet rank to push its diaspora envelope.

In conclusion, considering the enormous socio-economic challenges that the incoming Tinubu government will inherit and the fact that some fundamental changes must be made not only to the country’s structure but also its governance system for superlative performance as well as meeting the people’s expectations, the establishment of a Federal Ministry of Diaspora Affairs is sine qua non to the realization of the Tinubu administration’s economic objectives and development aspirations.

Nigerians in the diaspora have demonstrated the wherewithal to positively affect the development of an underdeveloped economy like Nigeria as they have done—-and continue to do—-in their host countries around the world. The time to deliberately and strategically include them in the nation’s development paradigm is now. Anything short of this move would not only be counter-intuitive but would be patently uncivilized.

Femi Odere was the former Senior Special Assistant to former Governor Kayode Fayemi of Ekiti State on Diaspora Affairs. He was the Chairman of States’ Diaspora Focal Point Officers and former Head of Media and Publicity at the Diaspora Directorate, APC PCC. Femi Odere lives in Iropora-Ekiti and he can be reached at femiodere@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Opinion

Let’s Save Our Democracy from this Axis Of Evil, by Hassan Gimba

Published

on

Let’s Save Our Democracy from this Axis Of Evil, by Hassan Gimba

Several people, including Nigerian leaders, have said that democracy, as a form of government, has no better alternative. And why not, if democracy is all about a system of government in which the governed freely participate in electing their representatives?

Nigeria has had a go at practising democracy even before its independence from Britain. From independence, we practised it fully for six years, though it was the Westminster system, bequeathed to us by the colonisers. It got its name from the central London area hosting the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

The Westminster model, which Nigeria started with, is a system in which there is a head of state (or president), a prime minister who heads the government, and an elected parliament (made up of one or two houses) from which the head of government emerges.

Then, there was a thirteen-year military interregnum, during which the men in khaki and jackboots ran the country’s affairs by decree and instituting a unitary form of government, the top-to-bottom command structure they knew all too well.

Fully aware that democracy is more in tandem with human nature, the Khaki Boys organised a constitutional conference in 1979 to usher in a democratic government, opting for a presidential system fashioned after the American model.

However, it did not last as long as the parliamentary system because, four years later, the jackboots returned. It was only 15 years later, in 1999, that the starched khaki-wearing leaders freed Nigeria from their grasp after seeing that stratocracy was globally going out of fashion.

In all of our adventurism with the forms of democracy, it is only in the current dispensation that one sees politicians holding the reins of their party’s leadership, yet sabotaging it.

In the First Republic, for instance, Obafemi Awolowo was the chairman of the Action Congress (AG), while Anthony Enahoro, and later Bola Ige, were its secretaries-general. The National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroons (NCNC) had Herbert Macaulay and Nnamdi Azikiwe as chairman and secretary-general, respectively.

The Second Republic’s National Party of Nigeria (NPN) had Augustus Akinloye as its chairman, and the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP) had Alhaji Falalu Bello. In this dispensation, we have had the All Progressives Congress (APC) with Bisi Akande and Tijjani Musa Tumsah as chairman and secretary-general, respectively.

Despite the average man’s inordinate desire for worldly gains, these chairmen of the opposition political parties never took part in any subterfuge against their parties. History will surely be kind to them as those who endured being in opposition for the sake of democracy and integrity.

There is no integrity where a citizen is playing politics for his stomach. It becomes worse when he willingly sells himself to the devil so that he can own mansions, choice plots, and hefty bank accounts in various currencies. These are the sorts of people that history consigns to the dirty bin it keeps for villains and the immoral.

We may not sound the alarm over the heinous acts of the unprincipled and “long-throat” politicians if not for their desperate—and, from all indications, succeeding—shenanigans involving the judiciary that could jeopardise our democracy.

They are bent on making a mockery of the judiciary, compromising those they can compromise and shopping for favourable judgements from “understanding” or “sympathetic” judges.

As a result of this unholy romance between a triumvirate of monied politicians (whose source of wealth can lead to capital punishment in a sane country), the perfidious, unscrupulous party chieftains, and mercenary judges, Nigeria’s democracy is at risk from this “axis of evil!”

This repugnant alliance, apart from casting the courts in a bad light, is threatening to give them a role never envisaged for them by the framers of our constitution—a power superseding even that of the constitution. Now, courts are managers of political parties, telling them when to meet, who their leaders should be, who their members should be, etc. This is why those who defected from their party—whom the constitution says cease to be party members—remain in their seats courtesy of the courts. Some judgements even turn established precedents and Supreme Court rulings on their heads.

Many lawyers, too, have become willing tools in the hands of the “axis of evil,” as they have no qualms defending the indefensible under the cover of the Constitution, which deems one innocent until proven otherwise. Ordinarily, they know, we know, and everyone knows that the culprits are guilty as charged.

The law must be applied common-sensibly. As the late Gani Fawehinmi, SAN, would say, legality should be guided by morality. Any law or court that sides with the wrongdoer is not helping the country.

This is why law and order are breaking down because the criminal-minded know that even if arrested, they can meander their way out as there are clever lawyers ready to take their rotten briefs for the money and judges who would set them free for a pot of porridge. The rotten lawyers know the houses and haunts of the rotten judges… birds of a feather, they say, flock together.

Is it any wonder that the wicked no longer fear the law or the authority doling it out, or that the innocent citizen fears the outlaw more than the custodian of the law? For one, the lawbreaker knows his atrocities might go unpunished, while the law-abiding fears the law cannot protect him since he may not be able to afford it.

This is why, among many others, the sit-at-home agenda of separatists in the Southeast will continue to be obeyed.

But like almost everything, there must be a way out. Oh, sure, there must be.

The Judicial Service Commission must intervene. They must remove the rug from under the feet of renegade judges who have become turncoats. The Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) must start punishing lawyers who engage in forum shopping and other ethical breaches.

But before that, the Nigerian Law School must incorporate subjects into its curriculum to teach the importance of morality and loyalty to the Constitution and the nation.

Then the judiciary must truly be independent in all ramifications; therefore, houses, cars, and any other welfare should not be doled out to its members by the executive. These are not favours and should not be made to be so or to look like one.

Hassan Gimba, anipr, is the publisher and CEO of Neptune Prime.

Continue Reading

Opinion

UN in Nigeria: Charting a Path Towards a Brighter Future, By Mohamed Malick Fall

Published

on

UN in Nigeria: Charting a Path Towards a Brighter Future, By Mohamed Malick Fall

The indescribable destruction caused by the first and second world wars led many to desire an international organization dedicated to maintaining world peace.

The United Nations (UN) was therefore established on 24 October 1945, to maintain international peace and security and to achieve cooperation among nations on economic, social, and humanitarian challenges.

As we commemorate the ‘birth’ of the UN, we are reminded of its enduring legacy in promoting peace, development, and humanitarian relief across the globe.

The creation of the UN, nearly eight decades ago was a pivotal moment in international history – anchored in the vision of a world united to prevent conflict, protect human rights, and ensure dignity for all.

The values enshrined in the UN Charter resonate strongly in Nigeria, a nation that joined the UN on 7 October 1960, just days after gaining its independence.

Some will argue that the need for the UN has never been greater than it is today, at a time when multilateralism and interstate collaboration is under threat in an increasingly divided world. Not only is the spectre of conflict rearing its ugly head, but pandemics have also killed millions of people in the last few years.

Most importantly, humankind is facing an existential challenge through climate change. If we are to survive, we will need to put our own interest aside for that of humanity and common survival.

The UN’s engagement with Nigeria has been deep and transformative, spanning development initiatives, and humanitarian responses to the challenges faced by vulnerable people. Through decades of partnership, the UN has played a central role in support of the Government of Nigeria, positively impacting the lives of millions through its wide-ranging interventions.

First, humanity is at the heart of the UN’s work in Nigeria. Across Nigeria, each region faces distinct humanitarian challenges. The UN, through its agencies, in collaboration with local and international partners, with the Nigerian Government taking the lead, has acted as a beacon of hope for those in crisis. Interventions have ranged from providing life-saving food and medical supplies, to addressing the long-term needs of displaced people, including education, and psychosocial care.

The UN supports resilience building, agricultural recovery, food security, and livelihoods in affected communities, as well as reproductive health and protection services against gender-based violence. Furthermore, the UN aids displaced people and refugees, providing shelter and basic needs, while also supporting child protection, education, health, and nutrition programmes.

In Borno, Adamawa, and Yobe states, where conflict and displacement have left millions vulnerable, UN-coordinated humanitarian responses have been crucial. Over the past decade, at least five million people have received aid annually, courtesy of the UN and partners, ensuring their access to food, water, healthcare, and protection services.

Beyond emergency responses, the UN has continued to support Nigeria’s development. It has been pivotal in fostering sustainable development through a focus on capacity building, governance reform, and the empowerment of women and youth. Over the years, the UN has supported numerous educational and vocational programmes that have enabled thousands of Nigerians to rise above poverty and build better futures for themselves and their families.

More so, the UN has supported the implementation of projects aimed at enhancing the resilience of communities. Initiatives in agriculture, renewable energy, and economic diversification have been particularly impactful in promoting food security and mitigating the effects of climate change. Similarly, its support for the fight against gender-based violence and human trafficking is helping protect vulnerable people and upholding human rights.

Despite these successes, the road has not been without challenges.

Conflict, displacement, food insecurity, malnutrition, natural disasters, and climate change impacts remain significant hurdles in Nigeria’s path to sustainable development.

The humanitarian crisis in the north-east persists, with violence continuing to disrupt lives and livelihoods. The northwest struggles with escalating banditry and communal clashes, displacing thousands.

The north-central region faces recurrent farmer-herder conflicts, threatening food security and livelihoods. The south-west grapples with violence and kidnapping, posing risks to safety. The south-south is grappling with environmental degradation affecting both livelihoods and ecosystems. In the south-east, rising insecurity has disrupted local economies and essential services, intensifying the humanitarian needs of affected communities.

Moreover, rising inflation and the global economic downturn have compounded the struggles faced by Nigeria’s most vulnerable people.

As we celebrate the UN’s impact in Nigeria, let us remember that the journey continues.

Let all hands be on deck!

Mohamed Malick Fall is the UN Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator in Nigeria.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Remembering Iyalode of Yorubaland

Published

on

Remembering Iyalode of Yorubaland

By Dimeji Kayode-Adedeji

Precisely 365 days today at about 6. 45am, a telephone call I first received came from the home of Alaba Oluwaseun Lawson. My heart skipped…and listening to the voice from other end of the phone, It was sad news… Mama has gone to the Lord.

Honestly, I was immediately confused and still on my Jalamia, (Pyjamas) I drove straight to her private residence at Quarry Road in Abeokuta. Reality dawned on me on arrival and I couldn’t hold back tears which rolled down my face and I became speechless.

It was a Saturday I used to appear on live radio program on fresh F.M between 9-11am. When I regained my consciousness, I put a call across to management of the station, that I can’t make it because I was bereaved. As I was still trying to comport myself and further regain my strength as a man, there were torrential phone calls from my colleagues in the pen profession, knowing that I was her media adviser, trying to confirm authenticity of the sad news.

 I had no choice I had to issue a press statement early enough to avoid speculations and wrong news dissemination. I must confess in my career as journalist of over three decades that was my first time I will be writing a press statement on a demise of any individual.

 I must again openly say this, late Iyalode Alaba Lawson, Iyalode of Yorubaland, I knew for over 30 years was my great benefactor and I will continue to appreciate her even in death. She was there for me all time, a reliable mother, a sister and aunty from another womb.

 I have no regret knowing her, if there is opportunity to keep relationship in heaven, I will keep that relationship with Alaba Oluwaseun Lawson (Omo Jiboku Tanatana). Its exactly a year today you left this sinful world to rest in the arms of the Lord. The legacies you left behind speak volume. I pray you continue to rest in perfect peace. Adieu

Prince Dimeji Kayode-Adedeji is founder of Penpushing Media and Media Adviser to late Iyalode of Yorubland, Iyalode Alaba Lawson

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2021 All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written permission from August24news.com
This Website is designed and Managed by: August 24 Communications Nigerian Limited (RC: 798585)